Blog Post #4
The Brockle-hunter VERSUS "Never" Miss Temple
IN THE OCTAGON
![]() |
| Brocklehurst depicted in the Kicking Position. Miss Temple is seen waiting for her chance |
Prior to Brocklehurst's dialogue, the internal narration of Jane Eyre reveals a standing dislike of Brocklehurst by Jane. Jane considers the man unpleasant and she's apprehensive by his immediate appearance. However, she becomes relieved after he begins speaking to Miss Temple. From his dialogue, the audience can infer he is not an empathetic man and, if anything, he is a Scrooge-esque character (A Christmas Carol was written 4 years prior to Jane Eyre). The analogy in question that's being analyzed is between a sub-par breakfast and tragedies of ancient Jewish people. After Miss Temple explains that she allowed "lunches" (an uncommon practice) to be made due to the unacceptable breakfasts, Brocklehurst expressed his anger. He stated that the discomfort of not eating/suffering through the meal could hold a light to the torments of the children's people. "A judicious instructor would take the opportunity of referring to the sufferings of the primitive Christians" (Brontë Ch. 7 Para. 21). Brocklehurst's analogy here reveals much about his character. In his head, he may see himself as something of a hero. He believes he is doing a great deed for these children by 'shaping' them into real adults of great character. This can be seen by the rigid fundamentalism that he invokes in his analogies and dialogue. Everything he says is philosophically stunted by being rooted, neither in reality nor in the faith that he is trying to spread. Brocklehurst states "You may indeed feed their vile bodies, but you little think how you starve their immortal souls!" (Brontë Ch. 7 Para. 21). Brilliantly written by Brontë if I do say so myself. She conveys a perspective of resentment and attempted spiritual 'saving.'
Miss Temple, on the other hand, seems to be a rational character from what can be inferred from just the passage. She allows the children extra clothing for specific situations and understands when food just isn't tolerable. The juxtaposition of these two characters, Brocklehurst and Temple, reveals the various different social messages that Brontë wishes to develop. There are two main lenses that I want to examine this chapter with, although more can be applied. The first that could be used is a Marxist lens. Although the concept "Marxism" really gained traction years after Jane Eyre was published, the term first arose during its writing and the idea was still applicable. The core idea is that there is a class struggle between that of the rich and that of the poor. This social message is revealed especially when examining the juxtaposition of the two characters. The attitude of Brocklehurst is seen as villainous ("rich") and Miss Temple is seen as saintly ("poor" or the common people). The same sort of concept of light versus dark (dichotomy) is used when using a feminist lens. One can consider Brocklehurst as being cruel to Miss Temple due to the fact that she is a woman. Considering the context of the mid-1800s, it is definitely not that uncommon. At the time, women were extremely oppressed by society. This feminist theme is a motif throughout the text and, even without reading the entire text, it can be seen how effective the text is on that social message. Jane Eyre was published in 1847. In 1848, the women's rights movement launched on a national level and, currently, Jane Eyre, is cited as a major novel for the women's rights movement. It was a powerful text with a powerful message that is still considered one of the greatest novels in 2018.
Until next time, I'm Connor LaRocca and this is Character Cage Combat. Also, Brocklehurst won because Miss Temple was a woman in 1847 and no woman won in 1847. Thanks everyone.

Hey Connor, I really liked your post. I appreciate your use of analysis of a large variety of language, including juxtaposition and characterization, and that you took from what we have learned in class and used dichotomy. I also liked your analysis through a marxist lens, especially since you noted how it wouldn't really be classified as a Marxist lens at the time. I think it was great of you to note your examination through different lenses, since it was not required by the question, but certainly added to your answer. I think you could have expanded a bit more on what Bronte's social message was, but overall, great job!
ReplyDeleteHonestly this post opened my third eye. I really like the idea of Brocklehurst seeing himself as a hero and the inclusion of different lenses into your analysis, especially including Marxism. You mention the feminist motif and examine the text through the lens very well, but you somewhat glossed over how it fit into Bronte's social message. Still a fantastic post though!
ReplyDeleteThis was interesting. I liked that I could clearly understand what was going on. I think your analysis was very deep and really opened doors to a different perspective I never would’ve expected. Great post !
ReplyDeleteHey Connor-
ReplyDeleteNice job here and a fun read. Here's further feedback from the blog post rubric:
- Postings provide comprehensive insight, understanding, and reflective thought about the topic (4)
- Postings present a specific viewpoint that is substantiated by supporting examples (3)
- Postings are well written with attempts made to stimulate dialogue and commentary (4)
- Postings are written in a style that is appealing and appropriate for the intended audience and a consistent voice is evident throughout (4)
- Postings reflect a bit of the author’s personality through word choices that attempt to bring the topic to life (3)
- All images, media and text created by others display appropriate copyright permissions and accurate citations (4)
- Written responses are free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing facilitates communication (4)
26/28